In the August 1951 , James Stern chose an approach that, unfortunately, was popular nationwide. Gets kind of monotonous." Still others condemned the novel.
In the August 1951 , James Stern chose an approach that, unfortunately, was popular nationwide. Gets kind of monotonous." Still others condemned the novel.Tags: Home Staging Business PlanMls Referee AssignmentsResearch Paper On BeowulfPossible Worlds And Other Essays Jbs HaldaneApa For A ThesisStrategic Planning In Business ManagementAustralian Institute Of Administrative Law National Essay PrizeEssay On CosmeticsWrite Short Essay StoryGhost Writing Paper
Swados and others seem to resent Salinger's popularity, which they attribute to a "cult of personality." The continuing appeal of can be traced to two factors. Even Salinger's critics usually admit that he captures the vernacular of the prep school adolescent of the time.
Second, the novel's insight appeals to the young, the young at heart, the dreamers of succeeding generations and various cultures.
That repetition (everyone is a "damn phony" to Holden Caufield) is wearing to contemporary audiences, as Jennifer Schuessler noted in 2009.
“Holden Caulfield is supposed to be this paradigmatic teenager we can all relate to, but we don’t really speak this way or talk about these things,” noted one teacher Schuessler interviewed.
The unusual thing about Salinger's first novel is its staying power. On July 14, 1951, the magazine, we might expect extensive attention from that publication, and such was the case; S. Behrman wrote an unusually long and strong review (August 11, 1951), stressing the personal attraction of Phoebe and Holden as characters.
The Book-of-the-Month Club selected the novel as a summer alternate, assuring significant sales and widespread attention.
(which is written in the style of the novel itself and will annoy the hell out of you) doesn't actually have much to say about the work that would become a worldwide phenomenon and one of the most commonly cited "favorite books" of all time.
It runs through the general plotline (using the word "crumby" six times, including in the title "Aw, the World's a Crumby Place"), notes a few complaints about its length, but then concludes with the thought that the novel is worth reading all over again. Salinger's rendering of teen-age speech is wonderful: the unconscious humor, the repetitions, the slang and profanity, the emphasis, all are just right.
Holden's mercurial changes of mood, his stubborn refusal to admit his own sensitiveness and emotions, his cheerful disregard of what is sometimes known as reality, are typically and heart-breakingly adolescent. Certainly you'll look a long time before you'll meet another youngster like Holden Caulfield, as likable and, in spite of his failings, as sound.
This first review, along with dozens upon dozens of other gushing essays, accolades, inclusion on nearly every "Best Books of the Twentieth Century" list, and one of the best word-of-mouth buzz campaigns in literary history, cemented its reputation as 's publication.