Indeed, in many respects the origins of modern psychology are intimately bound up with the psychologists who explicitly proposed interpretations of belief in God".It is time to confront the church about its love affair with "christian psychology." To remain silent would continue tacit approval for the irreparable harm being done to the church, to Christian families, to Christian marriages, and to Christian lives by these so-called heroes of idolatrous adulation.Can there be any fellowship between darkness and light? Well regardless of what others might say, I believe it is the teaching of psychology now prominent in the historic Christian churches of our nation.
Are they compatible with Christianity or do they have vastly different ways of looking at the world? THE CHRISTIAN AND PSYCHOLOGY by the Southern View Chapel By any standard psychology has had a major impact upon the Christian community during the past thirty years.
Whether that impact has been positive, negative or simply neutral is often the topic of hot debate.
Achieving the desired therapeutic outcome depends, in part, upon choosing the right type of therapy/counseling. These are not all-inclusive, nor are these categories universally agreed upon.
The way these different terms are used may vary greatly from therapist to therapist.
Evangelical's seem to have been polarized into one of three or four camps: Integrationists believe that since all truth is God's truth the integration of scriptural truth with psychological "truth" is no big problem.
As long as psychological "truth" does not contradict the Bible it can be trusted.The theories that have developed from psychological research have given rise to three major schools and literally hundreds of psychotherapies (which are often unscientifically mixed in practice). Any created thing which would substitute itself for the word of the Creator is an idol and a false god.Many Christians believe they have been abandoned by the church and consequently turn to psychology. As Aaron told Moses, the people demanded a golden calf and they threw in their treasure and out came the idol.If one has a spiritual problem they should turn to the Bible; if one has a problem such as anxiety, guilt, self-acceptance, insecurity, etc. Then there are those who would claim to be biblical counselors who simply borrow the best that psychology has to offer without actually integrating it with the Word.Larry Crabb takes this approach which he calls "spoiling the Egyptians" (Effective Biblical Counseling, p. The following is what Crabb has spoiled from the Egyptians (secular psychologists) that he feels is necessary to his system. As we write this paper, we realize that Christian Psychology has become somewhat of a sacred cow.An approach is suggested that would center on the concept of captivity (2 Corinthians 10:5) based on the Ten Commandments rather than integration.Religion in an Age of Science by Ian Barbour Chapter 1: Ways of Relating Science and Religion After surveying four broad patterns - Conflict, Biblical Literalism, Dialogue, Integration- Ian Barbour suggest reasons for supporting Here Dimery address in some detail the concept of complementarity of science and religion, and especially one of the major difficulties with proposing such a model, the resolution of instances of conflict.A third view would separate biblical truth from psychological truth and make no attempt to reconcile the two.The idea behind this position is that the Scriptures deal with spiritual and theological issues, while psychology handles mental and psychological problems that are outside the scope of the Bible.Many people want to say that psychology can be integrated with the bible and Christianity. This is also true of the idol of psychology which seeks to supplant the pure word of God.This is sort of like mixing apples and oranges which results in fruit salad. What one thing today, is the most dangerous teaching found in the world of Christianity?