After reading your literature review, it should be clear to the reader that you have up-to-date awareness of the relevant work of others, and that the research question you are asking is relevant. Be wary of saying that your research will solve a problem, or that it will change practice.
It would be safer and probably more realistic to say that your research will ‘address a gap’, rather than that it will ‘fill a gap’.
Sometimes this is a standalone investigation of how an idea or field of inquiry has developed over time.
However, more usually it’s the part of an academic paper, thesis or dissertation that sets out the background against which a study takes place. In a college paper, you can use a literature review to demonstrate your understanding of the subject matter.
If your results are different, though, you’ll need to discuss why and whether the difference is important.
This Study Guide explains why literature reviews are needed, and how they can be conducted and reported.In addition, ideas for improving future research in this field are provided. (2010), "The effects of process orientation: a literature review", Business Process Management Journal, Vol. People often treat writing the literature review in an academic paper as a formality.The effects most often reported are speed improvements, increase of customer satisfaction, improvement of quality, reduction of cost, and improvement of financial performance.According to the results of the paper, positive effects of PO are clearly more often reported than negative effects.An examination of the literature is undertaken to review studies that report about the influence of PO on organizational performance.Studies are classified into statements without straight empirical support, quantitative studies, and case studies.The paper identifies a lack of quantitative studies investigating the effects of PO on organizational performance. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637151011017985 Download as . The findings are derived from a comprehensive literature review of studies that have investigated the PO‐organizational performance link. By examining the strengths and weaknesses of existing research, you can thus make sure you adopt the most appropriate methods, data sources and analytical techniques for your own work.The significance of any results you achieve will depend to some extent on how they compare to those reported in the existing literature.