‘The 1960s and 1970s were a watershed for Dutch society.
‘The 1960s and 1970s were a watershed for Dutch society.Tags: Strategy For Business PlanEssays On RapeExample Of Introduction For Research PaperBusiness Plan TechnologyHow Can I Publish My Research PaperEhrenreich Nickel And Dimed EssayAnalytical Essay On PleasantvilleWhy Are Soldiers Heroes EssayThree Branches Of Government Essay Questions
In chronological order, these are The Netherlands, the Northern Territory of Australia, Oregon (USA), Belgium, and Canada.
Legal change was not required to allow assisted suicide in Switzerland.
Paul van der Maas (Department of Public Health, Erasmus University, Rotterdam): ‘…whether the acceptance of euthanasia or assisted suicide when it is specifically requested by a greatly suffering, terminally ill, competent patient is the first step on a slippery slope that will lead to an unintended and undesirable increase in the number of cases of less careful end-of-life decision making and to the gradual social acceptance of euthanasia performed for morally unacceptable reasons.’ (van der Maas et al, 1996).
The data for the period 1990 to 2015 show The Dutch view One of the better descriptions of the ‘slippery slope’, written in 2017, went as follows: ‘The core of this argument is that as soon as euthanasia is allowed at all, even if only under certain conditions, it will necessarily follow that euthanasia will in future be performed under less stringent conditions and will eventually degenerate into an absolutely abject form of euthanasia, such as killing people involuntarily.’ The alternative view It is not possible to list all the publications attesting to the existence of a slippery slope, but I include several good reviews that I have seen (Hendin, 1997a; Jochemsen and Keown, 1999; Hendin, 2002; Keown, 2002; Ten Have and Welie, 2005; Randall and Downie, 2009; Keown, 2012 & 2013; Sprung et al, 2018; Keown, 2018).
It is similarly a deliberate act with the express intention of ending life and is not ethically or morally distinguishable from euthanasia.
The performance of assisted suicide by persons other than physicians, as occurs in Switzerland, is ethically and morally equivalent to PAS.IAHPC prohibits the commercial use or reproduction and distribution of this material without authorization.Published by IAHPC Press 5535 Memorial Drive, Suite F- 509, Houston TX, 77007, USA Euthanasia is ‘a deliberate intervention undertaken with the express intention of ending a life so as to relieve intractable suffering’ (House of Lords, 1994; Walton, 1995).These include ‘death with dignity’, ‘medical assistance in dying’, and ‘the peaceful alternative’.But these terms do not alter the nature of the act and, where possible, are avoided.Withholding or withdrawing therapy may be entirely clinically appropriate, the possibility of life-shortening being acknowledged, but not intended.In contrast, withholding or withdrawing therapy performed with the intention of hastening death or ending life, is no different to euthanasia—these are deaths caused by the active intervention of the physician.The figures are also available from The Royal Dutch Medical Association (KNMG) website (see KNMG).Reports for 20 are available (see Regional Euthanasia Review Committees. The figures in Table 2 are calculated from the Dutch data.If it is performed at the dying person's request, it is voluntary; otherwise, it is non-voluntary.The terms ‘active’ and ‘passive’ may be misleading (Walton, 1995).