Hitchcock ultimately resolves both of these storylines in the film’s denouement.
Hitchcock ultimately resolves both of these storylines in the film’s denouement.Tags: Internship Essay ExamplesCase Study Leadership Change ManagementReview Of Literature On Employee MotivationBest Way To Start A Descriptive EssayEssays On Two Kinds By Amy TanReasons Against HomeworkNarrative Essay On The Book NightCompare Two Schools EssayCity Of Fallen Angels Book ReportWalt Disney Thesis Essay
It was an aspiration which everyone was expected to have, and this is reflected statistically—only 9.3% of homes then had single occupants (as opposed to around 25% today).
People also tended to marry at a younger age, generally in their early 20s.
The character of Doyle says almost these exact words: , as fulfilling this civic responsibility (which for Jeff means privately investigating Thorwald) means that Thorwald’s right to privacy gets totally thrown out the window. Evidently, this is a major moral dilemma: if you suspect that someone has committed murder, does this give you the right to disregard their privacy and surveil them in this way?
While the film doesn’t give a definite answer (and you won’t be required to give a definite answer), Hitchcock undoubtedly explores the complexity of this question.
Conversely, divorce was highly frowned upon, and once you were married, you would in general remain married for the rest of your life.
In particular, divorced women suffered massive financial difficulties, since men, as breadwinners, held higher-paying jobs, and women were only employed in traditionally female roles (e.g. Seen in this light, we can understand Lisa’s overwhelming desire to marry and settle down with Jeff.Lighting is one such cue that he uses a lot—it is said that at certain points in filming, he had used every single light owned by the studio in which this film was shot.In this film, lighting is used to reveal things: when the lights are on in any given apartment, Jeff is able to peer inside and watch through the window (almost resembling a little TV screen; Jeff is also able to channel surf through the various apartments—Hitchcock uses panning to show this).In particular, there was a real fear in America of Communist influences and Soviet espionage—so much so that a tribunal was established, supposedly to weed out Communists despite a general lack of evidence.This practice of making accusations without such evidence is now known as the Mc Carthyism, named after the senator behind the tribunal.Even Jeff has misgivings about what he’s seeing: “Do you suppose it’s ethical to watch a man with binoculars, and a long-focus lens—until you can see the freckles on the back of his neck, and almost read his mail?Do you suppose it’s ethical even if you prove he didn’t commit a crime?The film undoubtedly carries undertones of this, particularly in Jeff’s disregard for his neighbours’ privacy and his unparalleled ability to jump to conclusions about them.During this era, people really did fear one another, since the threat of Communism felt so widespread.As with any other text, the social conditions at the time of ’s release in 1954 inform and shape the interactions and events of the film.Released in the post-war period, the film is undoubtedly characterised by the interpersonal suspicion which defined the era.