Both versions support this discovery by referring to another theorist.The personal style version actually uses fewer words; and its note of personal discovery – ‘I was really surprised…’ – is actually quite attractive and gives the reader a sense of a living, thinking person behind the words.
Both versions support this discovery by referring to another theorist.The personal style version actually uses fewer words; and its note of personal discovery – ‘I was really surprised…’ – is actually quite attractive and gives the reader a sense of a living, thinking person behind the words.Tags: Short Essay On Education And DisciplineNus Undergraduate Scholarship EssayEdit Paper EssayAuto Service Business PlanCreative Writing TitlesBusiness Marketing Case Study
The rest of the article develops the discussion of the Heaney poem from particular theoretical perspectives. First, we get a good sense of a living, thinking person behind the writing.
Second, we get an impression of active thinking as Herron stops to review what he’s said and tell us what he’s going to say next and how he’s going to say it.
Let’s take a point from an imaginary essay and look at the two styles of writing it.
Here’s the academic version: In the light of Brown’s criticisms of Jones’s theory, the most surprising thing about Brown’s own theory is its marked similarities to Jones’s.
To defend [my thesis] I need to look at the notion of mimicry and its relationship with mockery.
How, in this drama of colonial subjectivity, does mimicry/mockery operate?A typical example would be ‘Professor X’s theory says this but what I think…’.Tutors who set and mark undergraduate essays are less interested in what you think than in what you know, what you can find out.The next two pages focus on a particular poem as an example of what is new in Heaney’s work.At the end of page five, we get the second passage, again in a personal style. Think about why you want to use ‘I’ and if doing so adds anything to your essay.In terms of the writer’s own development and learning, it’s important that they’ve made this surprising discovery.However, in terms of accepted and established ways of academic writing, the most important thing is the fact of the similarity between the two theories not the fact that yet another undergraduate has discovered it.One of the most frequently asked questions by students is ‘should I use ‘I’ in my writing? Some subjects encourage the use of ‘I’ while others actually frown on it or ‘ban’ it because it is thought to show a lack of objectivity.More confusingly, in my experience as a Royal Literary Fellow, even tutors teaching the same subject will have different views about it.Imagine you were studying for joint honours in Spanish and Management and that you’d spent a year working abroad in a Spanish business.In your final year, you decide to write a long essay about an aspect of Spanish business practices, let’s say different management styles. In your introduction, you might announce that the essay is going to use the theories of Professor X and Professor Y and the well-known Model of A; but you could also say that you are going to test some of these ideas against your own experiences.